In the Counter-Strike 2 community, players are discussing an alleged trick that unscrupulous users can use to get their opponents blocked. According to these reports, on one of the maps it is possible to create a situation in which the anti-cheat system VAC Live mistakenly punishes fair players. Information about the scheme has not yet received independent confirmation, but it has surfaced against the backdrop of recently strengthened anti-cheat measures in the game.
The trap, as it is described, plays out on a map called Inferno. At the start of a match, one of the teams announces its intention to lose and throws smoke grenades at its own feet. Their opponents, taking the chance to rack up points easily, advance onto the enemy base and shoot at players through the smoke. It is claimed that by around the seventh round the protection system may interrupt the match and impose sanctions on the team that attacked.
The authors of these reports suggest that a series of kills through smoke triggers a false positive in VACnet, the system that analyzes player behavior. The anti-cheat may treat unusually accurate shooting at unseen targets as a sign of cheating. However, the criteria by which this system operates are closed, so the cause of a possible ban cannot be established with certainty. It is also unknown whether those affected receive a permanent ban or only a temporary restriction on taking part in matches.
The rumors drew attention because in early October the VAC Live system became noticeably more active. Players began reporting more often on matches that the anti-cheat interrupted after six or seven rounds. Part of the community welcomes the tougher fight against cheaters, while others express concern about possible errors.
The difference between the types of punishment is significant. The rules of the game's developer, Valve, provide that a player who behaves abnormally may be disconnected from a match and temporarily barred from all game modes. A permanent ban is a separate and more severe measure. The company acknowledges that automatic protection may trigger by mistake and provides a mechanism for reversing wrongly issued penalties.
There is still no confirmed data on the number of those affected, or on independent experts successfully reproducing the trick. Until technical evidence appears, reports of the new scheme should be regarded as unconfirmed.
Letters